Checked against Rule 510 before you file.
Lawli organizes your facts, runs 22 deterministic Rule 510 checks against them, and shows the exact Texas rule behind every result.
Legal information and filing preparation — not legal advice.
Notice to Vacate — extracted facts
Source-confirmedEvery fact links back to the span it came from. Conflicts wait for you to confirm.
Verify the workflow before you decide
See the work Lawli does before you ask it to do work for you.
Deadline first
The workflow names the deadline, consequence, and next safe step before it asks for extra detail.
Procedural Safety Check
22 deterministic Rule 510 checks run against your facts before filing. Every result cites the exact Texas rule — no AI guessing.
Attorney Review keeps context
If the task needs legal judgment, the handoff carries facts, documents, and workflow state forward.
Start with a seeded walkthrough. It uses sample facts and shows where the product checks, stops, and asks for confirmation.
Choose the walkthrough closest to the task you need to understand.
Each walkthrough moves from plain-language facts to structured details, procedural checks, deadlines, and an attorney handoff when legal judgment is needed.
Small claims — Preflight
Montgomery County Justice Court · ENReview the synthetic Luz Ramos v AutoFix LLC small-claims packet at its preflight stage, including the stated $850 amount and Montgomery County venue.
Urgency
Review the sample packet before filing
Next step
Preflight → sample deadlines → handoff
Debt claim — Step 2
Harris County Justice Court JP 5-2 · ENReview the synthetic Maria Garcia v Capital One debt-claim packet for the stated $3,200 amount at its Step 2 stage.
Urgency
Review the sample facts before filing
Next step
Packet preview → sample deadlines → handoff
Texas eviction response
Travis County Justice Court JP 1-1 · ENReview the synthetic Oak Grove Properties v James T Washington eviction-response packet with its stated 3-day notice fact at the Step 1 intake stage.
Urgency
Review the sample notice facts
Next step
Intake → packet preview → handoff
Lawli matters because the AI is attached to an actual legal workflow.
The product story should be simple: AI does the heavy intake work, rules keep the output disciplined, and the user gets a clearer route to action.
AI builds the case file
Lawli captures the people, court, facts, language, and documents that drive the filing. The goal is a structured legal task, not a clever conversation.
Texas rules shape the packet
That case file flows into Texas-first forms, packet assembly, routing checks, and deadline logic so the output stays grounded in court reality.
You file or escalate with context
Export the packet, track the dates, or escalate to Attorney Review with the same facts and documents already in place.
A focused route from facts to the next safe action.
Not fake urgency
Lawli shows the date, rule path, and consequence. It does not use panic copy to force a click.
Not a generic legal chatbot
Questions support a task: deadline, court route, filing checks, source review, and attorney handoff.
Procedural Safety Engine, not a checklist
22 approved Rule 510 rules compile from a signed pack and evaluate your facts deterministically. Every result carries the source pinpoint, rule version, and explanation trace.
Current against SB 38
SB 38 rewrote JP eviction procedure effective 2026-01-01. Lawli tracks the rewrite so your petition and notice checks do not run on a stale form.
Where Lawli stops
Lawli can help you fill approved forms, organize facts, check deadlines, and prepare a filing kit. Lawli stops when your situation requires legal judgment, custom arguments, or strategy. At that point, Attorney Review carries your facts and documents forward.
Talk to the teamEvaluate the workflow first. Then choose the right path.
Run the walkthrough if you are evaluating Lawli, create an account when you are ready to use a supported workflow, or review pricing before you decide.